David Icke is a conspiracy
culture phenomenon – proselytiser of a superconspiracy worldview which revolves
around a premise (reptilian shapeshifters reprazent!) that is outre even by the
established standards of conspiracism (at least the usual suspects – Masons,
Jews, Communists etc. – were still regarded as human rather than
interdimensional aliens). Yet he’s managed to overcome the embarrassment of
being seen on TV in a turquoise jumpsuit and parlay this worldview into a successful
career as professional conspiracy theorist, touring the globe performing his
conspiracist roadshow to large audiences (see image above).
Cue the question posed by the
likes of sociologists, journalists, and other conspiracy theorists envious at
Icke’s cultural profile and (presumably) financial success – what is the appeal
of Icke and his ideas to significant portions of the public?
Since a book could be written all
of the factors that feed into Ickean conspiracism (hint to publishers and
grant holders: I'm available) I’ll merely relate an encounter with a fellow citizen I had
recently that was quite illuminating in this regard. For several years I’ve
worked a shift or two at Hamilton’s main second-hand bookstore to supplement
study and teaching. This job has proved to be particularly interesting in
relation to studying conspiracy culture, as quite a few customers have come in
interested in conspiracy-related subjects, giving a bit of first-hand insight
into conspiracism in the wider NZ community.
Last weekend a young woman came in looking for a couple of things – one
of which was “anything by David Icke?”
We didn’t have anything - Icke’s
books occasionally come into the store, but don’t stay on the shelves very long
(another indicator of his popularity) – but, given that she didn’t fit the
usual profile of people interested in conspiracy subjects e.g. older white
males who give off a generally antisocial or starry-eyed vibe, I said I was
interested in why she liked Icke and got chatting on the subject.
Her first response was that she
related to Icke's core New Age premise that we humans are trapped in a lower state of vibration that
can be changed if we find out more about how the world operates (i.e. finding out that our potential for spiritual development is being suppressed by spiritual baddies like the reptilian shapeshifters). When I
mentioned the ‘reptilian shapeshifters’ in a sceptical tone, she said she found
it a bit far out but was prepared to keep an open mind. She also mentioned
Icke’s theory from his recent books that the moon is a giant hologram or whatever
that is designed to broadcast bad vibes from Saturn and keep us all in our
lower vibrational place. When I asked
her how she became aware and interested in Icke, she stated that she got into
him by looking up online material on Illuminati control of the music industry,
an Ickean theme that has become the basis of a whole little online subculture
with inherent viral appeal to the facebook generations (look up the likes of
the ‘Vigilant Citizen’ if you must…)
So, to make massive
extrapolations from a brief conversation with a stranger in the best scholarly
traditions:
- the mainstreaming of the Illuminati as an online
‘meme’ amongst the kids was, in this
woman’s case, the ‘gateway’ to getting into the conspiratorial ‘hard stuff’
i.e. Icke’s 900-page books.
-
the spiritual themes of Icke’s worldview – his
articulation of the Gnostic vision at the heart of much New Age thought, that
our current reality is a negative one that can be transcended through spiritual
knowledge - were what the woman was responding to on a personal/emotional
level, rather than the egregiousness of the reptilian shapeshifters. In other
words, Icke’s worldview wasn’t seen by the woman as totally negative and paranoid as might
be assumed with most conspiracy theories, but containing a positive and profound spiritual
message at its core which resonated with her for whatever reasons.
- the postmodern legacy of epistemological
relativism – that no knowledge system is necessarily more ‘right’ than another –
is reflected in the woman’s ‘open mind’ towards concepts such as reptilian
shapeshifters and the moon as an artificially constructed transmitter of
negative energy, which reflect science fiction more than anything approximating
science fact.
It may also be of note that the
other book she was after, along with the works of Icke, was popular finance
staple Rich Dad, Poor Dad by Robert
Kiyosaki. Perhaps a case of Kiyosaki’s
secular endorsements of material prosperity aligning with Icke’s New Age vision
of spiritual enlightenment in a fashion familiar from such horrors as the book
and movement that was The Secret from
a few years back (remember that? Oh, you’d forgotten. And now I’ve reminded
you. Sorry.) Or me making connections in the spirit of hermeneutic excess
typical of both conspiracy theorists and cultural studies scholarship…
No comments:
Post a Comment