Monday 8 May 2017

Conspiracy Field Trip #1: It's Monck Time!



Although the last few posts have been about current affairs of some relevance to conspiracy studies – the Trump administration and Hager and Stephenson’s ‘Hit and Run’ book – I’ve also accrued a bit of a back catalogue of local conspiracy culture-related topics that I intended to write about. Time to get stuck into the first of these (too late for my self-imposed April deadline - oh well...)


On the evening of Monday the 8th of April 2013 I was one of the hundred or so souls sitting in one of  the University of Waikato’s management school lecture theatres, listening to high profile UK global warming denier Lord Christopher Monckton ‘perform’ as part of his international ‘Climate of Freedom’ speaking tour. Monckton’s denialism is rooted in a standard-issue conspiracist worldview in which global warming is a ‘scam’, a system of political and economic control foisted upon the world by scientists and politicians who are implicated with sinister globalist/NWO agendas (Monckton wasn’t that prescriptive about what exactly these agendas entailed, but I was left with the impression is something in the general ballpark of a totalitarian system related to a communistic worldview).  The specious, pseudo-scientific nature of his arguments against global warming science have been extensively debunked and pilloried by scientists and critics, so my interest here is not in those areas, but rather some observations about the cultural dimensions of the event. To state in the vernacular: what was the vibe like? 

While the crowd was fairly diverse – I remember sitting next to a young Indian chap, and seeing a few women manning merchandise stands in the foyer – my overall impression of the audience was that it was dominated by middle-aged Pakeha men of the sort associated with an ACT Party convention or Federated Farmers meeting on the topic of water quality: rigid, Swanndri-clad slabs of ‘common-sense’, their ruddy cheeks and bullish visages barely containing their indignation for anything environmental that challenges the Pakeha capitalist status quo that has constituted the ‘right’ way of doing things in this country for the last century or so.   The hearty applause that such attendees gave to Monckton’s condemnation of the usual denialist villains – the UN, Agenda 21, Al Gore, liberal government bodies, climate scientists in general – provided affirmation of the populist ethos underlying the anti-environmentalism on display (an ethos that manifests in different forms according to the dominant resource industries of the countries involved: where denialism in the USA and Australia is centered around the oil and coal industries, in NZ it is rooted in dairy farming). 


A typical example of a Monckton slide: note complete lack of references for the sources of the data, lack of a key on the left axis to tell the reader what units of measurement are involved, and Monckton's heraldic crest displayed prominently centre right (cos it must be legit coming from a toff, yeah?)
This populist appeal was particularly interesting in relation to Monckton’s identity as a scion of the British class system.  Monckton’s publicity materials (interviews, PR bios, website blurbs) usually emphasise the details of his peerage and other class accoutrements in an implicit appeal to the ‘rule by your betters’ principle that was one of the defining features of British imperialism – that the upper classes innately possess intellectual and institutional authority in all subjects, outside of their obvious areas of expertise such as grouse-shooting, sherry-drinking, and inbreeding. A notable instance of this logic in operation during the talk was when Monckton asserted himself against a heckler’s dismissive comments by whipping out his certificate of membership in the Knights of Malta or similar upper-crust boys club, as if this verification of his aristocratic bona fides was sufficient in itself as a means of rebuttal. However, although NZ’s predominantly egalitarian social structures still contain lingering residues of colonial deference to the ‘mother country’, I felt that the crowd’s identification with Monckton was due less to his class status and more to the fact that his green-bashing message tapped into the Pakeha populism mentioned above. 

Gee, guess where you'll find this video? Clue: first letters start with Y and T...

Having previous familiarity with the denialist style, I found Monckton’s evidence and arguments too obviously meretricious and formulaic to generate the feelings of shock and indignation he would no doubt enjoy inducing in punters of liberal and environmentalist bent. Instead, my emotional responses were in the realm of pathos. There was something innately pathetic about Monckton and the event: a something reflected in the earnest way he brandished his credentials to the heckler like a schoolboy showing off his gold star for good work, a something reflected in the sloppy graphic design of his powerpoint slides, a something reflected in the crudely scanned covers of the home-burned DVDs of his lectures available in the lobby.  Upon reflection, this ‘something’ was the fact that this shabby, second-rate conspiracist spectacle was as much about Monckton sating his narcissistic desire for public attention as it was about preaching the gospel of denialism. In relation to this, my feelings of pathos were perhaps manifestations of the sense of sympathy engendered by some attention-seekers, whose brazen behaviour comes across as a means of fulfilling some deep-seated psychological need. In these respects the Monckton experience was probably a good case study in relation to research undertaken into the psychology of conspiracism, a verification of the thesis that conspiracy theory is often or as much an expression of personal psychology as it is political ideology or worldview. The degree of ‘sympathy for the Monckton’ that I felt should be taken as something specific to this event though: it’s hard to think of anyone feeling a twinge of pathos for conspiracist figures like David Irving. 


Title of this post a reference to the brilliant 1966 album ‘It’s Monk Time!’, by cult US garage-rockers The Monks.